Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980781›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Remote monitoring and heart failure.

Nicola Pierucci, Domenico Laviola, Marco Valerio Mariani, Alessio Nardini, Francesco Adamo, Karim Mahfouz, Carlo Colaiaco, Fabrizio Ammirati, Luca Santini, Carlo Lavalle

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Remote monitoring and outcomes in heart failure: 5-year study.Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicola PierucciDepartment of Clinical Internal Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-4081
Domenico LaviolaDepartment of Clinical Internal Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7621-5776
Marco Valerio MarianiDepartment of Clinical Internal Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy.
Alessio NardiniGeneral Direction of the Mission Unit for the Implementation of PNRR Interventions, Italian Ministry of Health.
Francesco AdamoCardiology Unit, Ospedale G.B. Grassi, Ostia, Rome, Italy.
Karim MahfouzCardiology Unit, Ospedale G.B. Grassi, Ostia, Rome, Italy.
Carlo ColaiacoCardiology Unit, Ospedale G.B. Grassi, Ostia, Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio AmmiratiCardiology Unit, Ospedale G.B. Grassi, Ostia, Rome, Italy.
Luca SantiniCardiology Unit, Ospedale G.B. Grassi, Ostia, Rome, Italy.
Carlo LavalleDepartment of Clinical Internal Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-4296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) represents one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In recent years, remote monitoring (RM) and telemedicine have emerged as a promising strategy to improve the management of patients with HF, reducing hospitalizations and enhancing the quality of life. Through the integration of technologies such as implantable sensors, home monitoring devices, and mobile applications, it is possible to detect clinical changes early, enabling timely interventions. This article provides an overview of available technologies for RM in HF, analyses the clinical benefits observed in various studies, and addresses the remaining challenges, such as the need for standardization, long-term sustainability, and widespread adoption. Remote monitoring offers significant potential to improve clinical outcomes but requires further research and development to optimize its use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

ConnectivityHeart failureMulti-parametric evaluationRemote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39980781
PMCPMC11836701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.