ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025
Critical analysis of the 2023 ESC guidelines on cardiomyopathy management.
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on the management of cardiomyopathies (CMPs), published 1 year ago, remain highly relevant. These guidelines provide a comprehensive framework to manage the complexity of CMPs, consolidating previous approaches. All CMPs are now addressed systematically in one document. The ESC recommends a 'CMP-oriented' approach, emphasizing thorough clinical assessments and phenotype-first categorization into hypertrophic, dilated, arrhythmogenic, restrictive, and non-dilated left ventricular CMP. Despite the utility of this method, certain classifications, such as arrhythmogenic right ventricular CMP and the novel non-dilated left ventricular CMP, raise controversies. Key advances in the guidelines include the use of genetic testing and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to refine diagnoses and inform treatment, especially for high-risk genotypes. These guidelines advocate for personalized, multidisciplinary care. Overall, they represent a significant step forward but highlight the evolving nature of CMP management as scientific understanding progresses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.