ArticleBrain communications2025
Neural pathway activation in the subthalamic region depends on stimulation polarity.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical utility of evoked potentials for programming subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinsons disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- An algorithmic procedure for measuring deep brain stimulation-induced capsular activation using motor evoked potentials.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Deep brain stimulation-induced local evoked potentials outperform spectral features in spatial and clinical STN mapping.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- An algorithmic procedure for measuring deep brain stimulation-induced capsular activation using motor evoked potentials.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Deep brain stimulation-induced local evoked potentials outperform spectral features in spatial and clinical STN mapping.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Are we ready for automated deep brain stimulation programming?Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Review
- Activation metrics for structural connectivity recruitment in deep brain stimulation.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Navigating neural pathways: how stimulation polarity shapes deep brain stimulation efficacy.Brain communications · 2025Article
- A nonlinear relationship of evoked responses following charge-balanced single-pulse electrical stimulation with varying pulse widths.Brain stimulationArticle
- Evaluation of DBS computational modeling methodologies using in-vivo electrophysiology in Parkinson's disease.Brain stimulationArticle
- Comprehensive map of axonal pathway activation as a function of subthalamic deep brain stimulation location and parameter settings.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease; however, there is limited understanding of which subthalamic pathways are recruited in response to stimulation. Here, by focusing on the polarity of the stimulus waveform (cathodic versus anodic), our goal was to elucidate biophysical mechanisms that underlie electrical stimulation in the human brain. In clinical studies, cathodic stimulation more easily triggers behavioural responses, but anodic DBS broadens the therapeutic window. This suggests that neural pathways involved respond preferentially depending on stimulus polarity. To experimentally compare the activation of therapeutically relevant pathways during cathodic and anodic subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS, pathway activation was quantified by measuring evoked potentials resulting from antidromic or orthodromic activation in 15 Parkinson's disease patients undergoing DBS implantation. Cortical evoked potentials (cEPs) were recorded using subdural electrocorticography, DBS local evoked potentials (DLEPs) were recorded from non-stimulating contacts, and electromyography activity was recorded from arm and face muscles. We measured (i) the amplitude of short-latency cEP, previously demonstrated to reflect activation of the cortico-STN hyperdirect pathway, (ii) DLEP amplitude thought to reflect activation of STN-globus pallidus (GP) pathway and (iii) amplitudes of very short-latency cEPs and motor evoked potentials for activation of corticospinal/bulbar tract (CSBT). We constructed recruitment and strength-duration curves for each EP/pathway to compare the excitability for different stimulation polarities. We compared experimental data with the most advanced DBS computational models. Our results provide experimental evidence that subcortical cathodic and anodic stimulation activate the same pathways in the STN region and that cathodic stimulation is in general more efficient. However, relative efficiency varies for different pathways so that anodic stimulation is the least efficient in activating CSBT, more efficient in activating the hyperdirect pathway and as efficient as cathodic in activating STN-GP pathway. Our experiments confirm biophysical model predictions regarding neural activations in the central nervous system and provide evidence that stimulus polarity has differential effects on passing axons, terminal synapses, and local neurons. Comparison of experimental results with clinical DBS studies provides further evidence that the hyperdirect pathway may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms of DBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.