ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2025
Women's experiences and acceptability of self-administered, home delivered, intravaginal 5-Fluorouracil cream for cervical precancer treatment in Kenya.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05362955 (5-fluorouracil Following Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treatment Among HIV-positive Women in East Africa), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
5-fluorouracil Following Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treatment Among HIV-positive Women in East Africa
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Combination Treatment for Cervical Precancer Among Women Living with HIV in South Africa: Secondary Outcomes from the ACT 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Acceptability and Feasibility of Combination Treatment for Cervical Precancer Among Women Living with HIV in South Africa: Primary Outcomes from the ACT 2 Randomized Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- "When a Thorn Comes Into Your Body, You Must Remove It". A Socio-Ecological Analysis of the Acceptability of Intravaginal Artesunate as Cervical Precancer Treatment in a Phase 1 Clinical Trial.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Access to cervical cancer care in sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative review of barriers and opportunities.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- "When a thorn comes into your body, you must remove it." A Socio-Ecological analysis of the Acceptability of Intravaginal Artesunate as Cervical Precancer Treatment in a Phase 1 Clinical trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Trying to Heal Without "Bringing Problems": Navigating Cervical Precancer Stigma in a Phase I Clinical Trial in Western Kenya.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Innovative strategies are essential to meet the World Health Organization's 90/70/90 cervical cancer elimination targets, aiming for 90% access to precancer treatment globally by 2030. In low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) where most cervical cancer cases occur, access to precancer treatment is severely limited. Scalable solutions like self-administered topical therapies can help close this gap. In a recent Phase I trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05362955), we demonstrated safety and adherence to self-administered intravaginal 5% 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) cream as an adjuvant therapy for cervical precancer among women living with HIV (WLWH) in rural Kenya. To understand women's experiences with self-administered 5FU, we evaluated the acceptability of this intervention among trial participants. Methods: All 12 participants from the Phase I trial completed a structured questionnaire and in-depth semi-structured interviews in their preferred language, focusing on their experiences with 5FU self-administration, challenges faced, and overall acceptability of the intervention, including whether they would use it again or recommend it to someone who needed it. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. In the qualitative study, acceptability was defined as "the perception that a given treatment is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory." A thematic analysis was conducted using five dimensions of acceptability: content, complexity, comfort, delivery, and credibility. Results: The mean age was 43.9 years (SD 4.4), and seven (58%) had primary education or less. While some participants reported feelings of uncertainty when they started using 5FU, at the end of the study, all 12 participants strongly agreed that the cream was safe and were confident they used it correctly. Most participants (91.7%) experienced no discomfort with the vaginal applicator, and most reported using tampons overnight after 5FU use, as recommended. Qualitative findings revealed that favorable perceptions of self-administered 5FU were driven by its ease of use, the discrete nature of the treatment, and the comfort of home application. The main challenges included correctly measuring the study drug, finding a private place at home to self-administer, and the need to use condoms during treatment. Compared to their previous ablation or excision treatments, participants found 5FU to be less painful, and all would prefer a self-administered treatment instead of a procedure if it were an option. Conclusion: Self-administered intravaginal 5FU as an adjuvant treatment for cervical precancer among women living with HIV in Kenya was highly acceptable. Randomized studies of 5FU and other topical therapies in LMICs are needed to evaluate their use in closing the current precancer treatment gaps in these settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.