ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Janus kinase inhibitor treatment for inflammatory diseases: excess or no excess risk of venous thromboembolism?
Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global perspectives on lupus nephritis: a review of clinical trials and therapeutic innovations.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Positioning and sequencing of advanced therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: A guide for clinical practice.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Effect of Tofacitinib on Hemostasis in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Comparative Ex Vivo Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases since their introduction in 2012. The expanded indications of JAKis have raised concerns about the associated risk of thrombosis, venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), and arterial thrombosis. This literature review examines studies reporting the risk of VTEs associated with JAKis in patients with inflammatory diseases. Phase I to III trials showed no increased risk of VTEs. However, these studies were not designed to detect adverse events such as VTEs. The pharmacovigilance data indicated that the frequency of VTE reports was higher than that of other adverse events. An increased risk of VTEs was also observed in the ORAL Surveillance study, a randomized, noninferiority, postmarketing phase IV safety study comparing tofacitinib with anti-tumor necrosis factor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, limitations have to be acknowledged: pharmacovigilance data are declarative and subject to bias, VTE was a secondary outcome in the ORAL study, with noncomparable VTE risk factors between groups and increased thrombosis risks only at high doses of tofacitinib. Nevertheless, these data have led regulatory organizations such as the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency to issue precautionary measures regarding the use of JAKis in inflammatory diseases. Most well-conducted real-life studies are in rheumatoid arthritis and do not confirm an excess of VTE risk associated with JAKis. Considering those conflicting results and limitations, future research should focus on specific indications and patient profiles, taking into account the complex interaction between drug treatment and underlying disease activity, to be able to draw definite conclusion about the VTE risk associated with JAKis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.