Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980604›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2023

A generalized Bayes framework for probabilistic clustering.

Tommaso Rigon, Amy H Herring, David B Dunson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bayesian Clustering via Fusing of Localized Densities.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A Gibbs Posterior Framework for Fair Clustering.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Spectral Clustering, Bayesian Spanning Forest, and Forest Process.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  5. BAYESIAN FUNCTIONAL REGISTRATION OF FMRI ACTIVATION MAPS.The annals of applied statistics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tommaso RigonDepartment of Economics, Management and Statistics, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Amy H HerringDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Box 90251, Durham, North Carolina 27708, U.S.A.
David B DunsonDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Box 90251, Durham, North Carolina 27708, U.S.A.

Funding

Reproducibility and Robustness of Dimensionality ReductionR01ES027498 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HERRING, AMY H · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Structured nonparametric methods for mixtures of exposuresR01ES028804 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DUNSON, DAVID BRIAN · 2018 to 2021
$2.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027498NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES028804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss-based clustering methods, such as k-means clustering and its variants, are standard tools for finding groups in data. However, the lack of quantification of uncertainty in the estimated clusters is a disadvantage. Model-based clustering based on mixture models provides an alternative approach, but such methods face computational problems and are highly sensitive to the choice of kernel. In this article we propose a generalized Bayes framework that bridges between these paradigms through the use of Gibbs posteriors. In conducting Bayesian updating, the loglikelihood is replaced by a loss function for clustering, leading to a rich family of clustering methods. The Gibbs posterior represents a coherent updating of Bayesian beliefs without needing to specify a likelihood for the data, and can be used for characterizing uncertainty in clustering. We consider losses based on Bregman divergence and pairwise similarities, and develop efficient deterministic algorithms for point estimation along with sampling algorithms for uncertainty quantification. Several existing clustering algorithms, including k-means, can be interpreted as generalized Bayes estimators in our framework, and thus we provide a method of uncertainty quantification for these approaches, allowing, for example, calculation of the probability that a data point is well clustered.

Indexed as

Gibbs posteriorK-meansLoss functionProduct partition modelUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID39980604
PMCPMC11840691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.