ArticleBiometrika2023
A generalized Bayes framework for probabilistic clustering.
Article in Biometrika, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian Clustering via Fusing of Localized Densities.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025Article
- PROBABILISTIC CONTRASTIVE DIMENSION REDUCTION FOR CASE-CONTROL STUDY DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- A Gibbs Posterior Framework for Fair Clustering.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Spectral Clustering, Bayesian Spanning Forest, and Forest Process.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024Article
- BAYESIAN FUNCTIONAL REGISTRATION OF FMRI ACTIVATION MAPS.The annals of applied statistics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Loss-based clustering methods, such as k-means clustering and its variants, are standard tools for finding groups in data. However, the lack of quantification of uncertainty in the estimated clusters is a disadvantage. Model-based clustering based on mixture models provides an alternative approach, but such methods face computational problems and are highly sensitive to the choice of kernel. In this article we propose a generalized Bayes framework that bridges between these paradigms through the use of Gibbs posteriors. In conducting Bayesian updating, the loglikelihood is replaced by a loss function for clustering, leading to a rich family of clustering methods. The Gibbs posterior represents a coherent updating of Bayesian beliefs without needing to specify a likelihood for the data, and can be used for characterizing uncertainty in clustering. We consider losses based on Bregman divergence and pairwise similarities, and develop efficient deterministic algorithms for point estimation along with sampling algorithms for uncertainty quantification. Several existing clustering algorithms, including k-means, can be interpreted as generalized Bayes estimators in our framework, and thus we provide a method of uncertainty quantification for these approaches, allowing, for example, calculation of the probability that a data point is well clustered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.