ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2025
Comparison of 13-, 15- and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in the paediatric Canadian population: A cost-utility analysis.
Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Two pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, covering 15 and 20 Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of Pneu-C-15 and Pneu-C-20 in unvaccinated infants initiating routine pneumococcal vaccination, compared to the currently used 13-valent conjugate vaccine (Pneu-C-13). Methods: A static cohort model was used to estimate sequential incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs in 2022 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life year [QALY]) of Pneu-C-13, Pneu-C-15 and Pneu-C-20 in the paediatric population starting their primary series. Costs and outcomes were calculated over a 10-year time horizon at the program level and a lifetime time horizon at the individual level and discounted at a rate of 1.5% per year. We explored the impact of uncertainties in model parameters and assumptions in scenario and sensitivity analyses. Results: Routine use of Pneu-C-20 and, to a lesser extent, Pneu-C-15 is projected to reduce pneumococcal disease burden, compared to Pneu-C-13. Based on product cost assumptions, sequential ICERs for Pneu-C-15 and Pneu-C-20 were $58,800 and $135,200 per QALY gained from the health system perspective and $18,272 and $93,416 per QALY gained from the societal perspective, excluding indirect effects. A reduction in serotype-attributable disease due to indirect vaccine effects of 5% or greater resulted in ICERs below $30,000 per QALY gained for Pneu-C-15 and Pneu-C-20, with the optimal strategy determined by the magnitude and time to reach a reduction in pneumococcal disease. Conclusion: Both Pneu-C-15 and Pneu-C-20 are expected to increase QALYs in Canadian children compared to Pneu-C-13 and may be cost-effective interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.