ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
The impact of integrated genomic analysis on molecular classifications and prognostic risk stratification in endometrial cancer: a Chinese experience.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evolutionary perspectives on endometrial cancer: antagonistic pleiotropy.Molecular & cellular oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The molecular classification of endometrial cancer (EC), as proposed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), has transformed tumor classification, but there is a lack of extensive research on the molecular profiles and subtyping of endometrial cancer patients in China. Methods: 200 EC patients were classified into the following four molecular types: (i) POLEmut; (ii) MSI-H; (iii) TP53mut; (iv) NSMP. This study aimed to investigate the molecular characteristics of EC patients at a single center by large-scale next generation sequencing(NGS), including clinicopathological features and gene mutations in patients with distinct molecular types, and to assess the relevance of molecular subtyping for postoperative adjuvant therapy. Results: NSMP group was the most prevalent, comprising 46.0% (92/200) of cases, followed by the TP53mut group at 17.5% (35/200), the MSI-H group at 23.5% (47/200), and the POLEmut group at 13.0% (26/200). CTNNB1 mutations were common in the POLEmut group but rare in the TP53mut group. With the application of the new European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2022 classification, 27 patients (14.1%) were reclassified. Concordance between the two classifications regarding postoperative risk was observed in 85.9% (165/192) of cases. Seven patients (3.6%) were downstaged, and twenty patients (10.4%) were upgraded. Additionally, the analysis revealed that eleven genes were significantly mutated in patients with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) compared to those without LVSI. Notably, NSD3 and POLD1 were highly mutated in patients with lymphatic metastasis compared to those without lymphatic metastasis. Conclusively, large-scale NGS has revolutionized EC management by facilitating rapid molecular subtype identification, guiding tailored adjuvant therapies, targeted treatments, and immunotherapies, and efficiently screening for Lynch syndrome, thereby significantly improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.