ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Improving diagnostic precision in thyroid nodule segmentation from ultrasound images with a self-attention mechanism-based Swin U-Net model.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training the diagnostic artificial intelligence in thyroid sonography: how well is deep learning truly learning?Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Malignancy-Aware Dual-Task Heatmap Decoupling for thyroid ultrasound nodule detection and classification.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Urological diagnostics based on kidney stone detection in CT imaging using YOLOv8 deep learning framework.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic predictive evaluation of pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia using digital chest CT analysis combined with clinical features.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate segmentation of thyroid nodules in ultrasound imaging remains a significant challenge in medical diagnostics, primarily due to edge blurring and substantial variability in nodule size. These challenges directly affect the precision of thyroid disorder diagnoses, which are crucial for metabolic and hormonal regulation. Methods: This study proposes a novel segmentation approach utilizing a Swin U-Net architecture enhanced with a self-attention mechanism. The model integrates residual and multiscale convolutional structures in the encoder path, with long skip connections feeding into an attention module to improve edge preservation and feature extraction. The decoder path employs these refined features to achieve precise segmentation. Comparative evaluations were conducted against traditional models, including U-Net and DeepLabv3+. Results: The Swin U-Net model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an average Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.78, surpassing baseline models such as U-Net and DeepLabv3+. The incorporation of residual and multiscale convolutional structures, along with the use of long skip connections, effectively addressed issues of edge blurring and nodule size variability. These advancements resulted in significant improvements in segmentation accuracy, highlighting the model's potential for addressing the inherent challenges of thyroid ultrasound imaging. Conclusion: The enhanced Swin U-Net architecture exhibits notable improvements in the robustness and accuracy of thyroid nodule segmentation, offering considerable potential for clinical applications in thyroid disorder diagnosis. While the study acknowledges dataset size limitations, the findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. This method represents a significant step toward more reliable and precise diagnostics in thyroid disease management, with potential implications for enhanced patient outcomes in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.