ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Increasing Pediatric Palliative Care Consultation for Patients with Heart Disease and Prolonged Cardiac Intensive Care Stay.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Framework for Building an Inclusive Quality Program in a Pediatric Heart Center.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with congenital heart disease are medically complex and experience high rates of morbidity and mortality. Pediatric palliative care (PPC) supports families navigating complex medical scenarios. This study evaluates the effect of quality improvement (QI) interventions towards increasing PPC consultations in patients with heart disease and cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) length of stay (LOS) ≥ 14 days. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods QI study using CICU team members and family survey assessments of PPC involvement. Patients with CICU LOS ≥14 days were eligible and comprised our study cohort. Interventions included the implementation of a digital prompt screening for eligible patients sent to CICU and PPC providers, as well as the implementation of weekly huddles to discuss consulted and eligible patients. Through the pre- and postintervention phases, family members of consulted patients and CICU team members were surveyed. Results: Preintervention (January 2020 to December 2021), PPC consultation rates were 35% (n = 34) and increased to 63% (n = 43) postintervention (January 2022 to February 2023) ( Conclusions: QI interventions, including collaborative huddles and digital prompts based on discrete screening criteria, lead to significantly increased rates of PPC consultation in patients with heart disease in the CICU. Survey results support PPC consultation as a positive contribution for families and CICU team members.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.