ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Time to First Feeding for Preterm Infants: A Quality Improvement Approach.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early full or near-full enteral feeding in clinically stable preterm infants across healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- GAIN: a multicenter pilot protocol for early initiation of enteral feeds in neonates with simple gastroschisis.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- Diagnostic utility of serum ferritin in culture proven bacterial infection: an observational study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- Standardised neonatal nutrition care bundle and growth velocity in infants <32 weeks: a single-centre pre-quality/post-quality improvement study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Observational
- Determinants of early lactation failure in mothers of moderately preterm neonates: a multilevel analysis of survey data.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early initiation of enteral feeding is reported to reduce sepsis and mortality in preterm infants. Less than half of stable infants born <35 weeks gestational age with birth weight <2,000 g are fed within 24 hours of birth at our center. Methods: The Specific, measureable, achievable, relevant, timely aim of this quality improvement project was to increase the initiation of enteral feeding within 24 hours of birth from 49% (baseline) to 75% among infants born <35 weeks gestational age with birth weight <2,000 g between November 2022 and December 2023. We identified the unavailability of a mother's own milk as a major barrier to early feeding initiation. Project interventions included antenatal lactation consultation, patient-dedicated breast pumps, standardized feeding orders, and multidisciplinary education. The outcome measure was the time to first enteral feeding, and the balancing measures were the diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and the use of formula for first feeding. Results: The proportion of infants with feeding initiated within 24 hours of birth increased from 49% to 80% during the project period. The incidence of NEC was unchanged (1.9% before and during the project period). Both before and during the project, feedings were most frequently initiated with pasteurized donor human milk (49.7% versus 58.7%), followed by mother's own milk (37.8% versus 35.6%) and formula (12.5% versus 5.8%). Conclusions: This quality improvement project increased the proportion of eligible infants fed within 24 hours of birth without a change in the incidence of NEC or an increase in formula use as first feeding.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.