Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980358›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025

Reconstruction of Segmental Duplication Rates and Associated Genomic Features by Network Analysis.

Eldar T Abdullaev, Dinesh A Haridoss, Peter F Arndt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eldar T AbdullaevDepartment of Computational Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9432-664X
Dinesh A HaridossDepartment of Computational Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-9549-6354
Peter F ArndtDepartment of Computational Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-9836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmental duplications are long genomic duplications that are fixed in a genome. Segmental duplications play an important evolutionary role because entire genes can be duplicated along with regulatory sequences. The ancestral segmental duplications of the human lineage gave rise to genes that are involved in the development of the human brain and provided sites for further genomic rearrangements. While some duplicated loci have been extensively studied, the universal principles and biological factors underlying the spread of segmental duplications remain unclear. Here, we represent segmental duplications in a network, with edges corresponding to duplication events and nodes corresponding to affected genomic sites. This representation allowed us to estimate how many duplications had occurred at each locus, and thereby enabling the prediction of genomic features associated with increased duplication rates. Our comprehensive study of genomic features associated with duplications and those associated with increased duplication rates allowed us to identify several biological factors affecting a segmental duplication process. In our study, we describe genomic features associated with increased duplication rates, three signatures of the duplication process and associations of segmental duplications with different classes of high-copy repeats. Furthermore our method is readily implemented and can easily be applied to segmental duplications of other genomes to build a network of segmental duplications or to predict real duplication events.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenomicsSegmental Duplications, GenomicEvolution, MolecularGenome, HumanHumansModels, Geneticcomplex networkshigh-copy repeatssegmental duplications

Identifiers

PMID39980358
PMCPMC11925013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.