ReviewTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Heterogeneity and individualized therapy for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
Review in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment patterns and disease burden of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) in the United States: A real-world observational, retrospective cohort study.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Article
- EGPA at Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Single-Center Profile of Laboratory Findings and Clinical Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Biological functions and clinical efficacy of IL-5/IL-5Rα-targeted therapies across eosinophilia-associated diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Hypoxia-Associated Molecular Subtypes Reveal Immune Checkpoint, Ferroptosis, and m6A Regulatory Heterogeneity in Pediatric Vasculitis.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Abdominal pain as the sole initial manifestation of ANCA-positive EGPA with myocarditis: a case report and literature review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), as a heterogeneous component of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, may be induced by a series of environmental and genetic factors, involved with a variety of immune cells and immune components, and presented with various clinical manifestations, with multiple organs and systems (respiratory, skin, heart, kidney, nerve, etc.) involved. The choice of glucocorticoid (GC) dosage and immunosuppressant in traditional treatment strategies varies greatly from individual to individual and is not universally applicable in all the EGPA phenotype spectrum, especially in relapsing or refractory diseases. With the understanding of the heterogeneity of EGPA, a variety of therapeutic approaches are emerging and improving the traditional treatment model. In this review, we summarized the heterogeneity of EGPA etiology and pathogenesis. Clinical and pathological manifestations of the same organ involved also show significant differences and there are even gender differences. Biological treatments that mainly target type 2 inflammatory pathways are widely used in clinical practice for remission induction and maintenance of EGPA. Targeted biological therapy has shown excellent performance in reducing GC dosage and controlling symptoms and recurrence. However, a large number of high-quality randomized controlled studies are still under research for relapsing or refractory EGPA with special organ involvement. We believe that EGPA has a highly heterogeneous phenotype spectrum, and the treatment patterns targeting key molecules in the pathogenesis are of great value for individual treatment of EGPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.