Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980287›Full record

ReviewCurrent molecular medicine2026

Recent Accomplishments in Exhaled Breath Condensate Analysis - Molecular Aspects.

Sergey V Silkin, Stanislav I Pekov, Konstantin V Bocharov, Igor A Popov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sergey V SilkinLaboratory for Molecular Medical Diagnostics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russian Federation.
Stanislav I PekovProject Center of Advanced Mass Spectrometry Technologies, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-9622-3457
Konstantin V BocharovLaboratory for Molecular Medical Diagnostics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russian Federation.
Igor A PopovLaboratory for Molecular Medical Diagnostics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russian Federation.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-03-2023-106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, the research of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) analysis is widely discussed in the scientific community. The growing interest in EBC analysis results is related to the ample advantages of non-invasive techniques in healthcare and related fields. In particular, EBC analysis can be used to diagnose respiratory diseases, monitor the disease's course during therapy, and monitor drug intake and metabolism. This review aims to systematize the accumulated knowledge on EBC collection, concentration, storage, and analysis methods and compare them with similar procedures for exhaled breath (EB). We proposed a generalized chemical classification of EBC compounds that are biomarkers for various diseases. The potential transformation of substances during EB condensation was considered, and EBC analysis methods were systematically categorized based on this classification. Methods for EBC analysis using chromatographic separation with mass spectrometric detection (hyphenated methods) were separately discussed as the most promising methods for future research applications.

Indexed as

ExhalationBiomarkersBreath TestsHumansMass SpectrometryBiomarkersexhaled breath analysisexhaled breath biomarkersExhaled breath condensateexhaled breath samplingnon-invasive diagnosticsrespiratory diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.