ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025
Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) feeding responses to double virus infections in melon.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Consequences of double virus infections on host plant preference and performance ofAnnals of the Entomological Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Virus infections cause economic losses in crops worldwide and their management and control present major challenges. In the field, double infections of two or more viruses are the rule, not the exception. The presence of several viruses in a plant makes it difficult to interpret virus-insect vector-plant interactions. Mixed infections can alter plant symptoms compared with single infections and may also impact their vectors. We describe plant-mediated indirect effects of virus double-infection on feeding behavior of an aphid vector (Aphis gossypii Glover) and virus transmission in melon (Cucumis melo L.). The viruses we used were a circulative cucurbit aphid-borne yellows virus (CABYV, Solemoviridae:Polerovirus) and a non-circulative cucumber mosaic virus (CMV, Bromoviridae:Cucumovirus). When melon plants were CMV-infected, indirect plant-mediated effects on A. gossypii feeding were like those reported on other plant species; specifically, intracellular punctures (pd) were more frequent and longer than on mock-inoculated plants, which enhanced CMV transmission. Similarly, when plants were CABYV-infected, we observed a statistically non-significant trend for increases in extended salivation (E1) and ingestion (E2) activities in phloem compared with mock-inoculated plants, which also enhanced CABYV transmission. When aphids fed on CMV-CABYV double-infected plants feeding behavior activities related to the transmission of both viruses were enhanced even more than when feeding on single-infected plants. Nevertheless, the virus transmission rate was the same on single-infected or double-infected plants. Thus, our results suggest that double infections do not modify viral dispersion compared with single infections since the indirect effect of CMV and CABYV in single infections is already optimized to favor virus transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.