ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2025
Evaluation of the role of liver metastasectomy in the treatment of stage IV endometrial cancer.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic approaches in patients with bone metastasis due to endometrial carcinoma - A systematic review.Journal of bone oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHepatic metastasectomy for gynecologic cancers remains controversial. Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) is complex. The purpose of this study is to analyze the efficacy of liver metastasectomy (LM) in the treatment of metastatic EC.
methodsThe National Cancer Database was used to create a retrospective cohort of adult women with EC metastatic to the liver between 2010 and 2016. Overall survival and all-cause mortality were estimated with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) curves and IPTW Cox proportional hazard regression, respectively.
resultsAmong 999 EC patients with oligometastatic disease to the liver, 162 (16.2%) underwent LM, 614 (61.5%) received chemotherapy, and 129 (12.9%) had chemotherapy and LM. Those who underwent chemotherapy, 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival for chemotherapy + LM versus chemotherapy alone were 67.8 versus 56.5%, 44.9 versus 33.4%, and 35.1 versus 23.1%, respectively. In unadjusted analysis, chemotherapy + LM group had reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]=0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.54-0.86) with longer median survival time (20.1 vs. 14.6 months, p=0.011) compared to chemotherapy alone. Adjusting for demographics and treatment characteristics, a possible reduction in mortality was associated with chemotherapy + LM (HR=0.74; 95% CI=0.55-1.01) compared to chemotherapy alone.
conclusionThis study of LM for EC suggests LM in addition to chemotherapy may be associated with improved outcomes for patients with EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.