ReviewThoracic cancer2025
Perioperative Treatment in EGFR-Mutant Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.
Review in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An explainable AI approach to surgical and radiotherapy interventions for optimized treatment decision-making in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adjuvant osimertinib administered over a 3-year period in patients diagnosed with stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has not only shown improvement in event-free survival but also demonstrated a prolonged overall survival (OS), leading to its approval as a standard treatment in this context. Meanwhile, no targeted studies have been conducted on the efficacy of adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in these patients. Although studies such as IMPOWER-010 and KEYNOTE-091 have included a small number of patients with positive driver genes, no definitive conclusions regarding the OS benefit have been established. Neoadjuvant targeted therapy is not currently recommended because of insufficient evidence, characterized by a low depth of pathological response and no reported improvement in survival outcomes. The same is true for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with EGFR mutations. Although numerous issues such as refining patient population selection, determining appropriate combination therapy regimens, establishing primary endpoints, assessing the influence of perioperative complications, and accurately evaluating the clinical application of circulating tumor DNA in various scenarios exist, several promising ongoing trials, including ADAURA2 and NEOADURA, are expected to provide valuable insights that will help address these questions. Here, we summarize the available evidence and clinical issues that need to be considered to optimize clinical decision-making for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.