ArticleBJS open2024
Investigating surgeon performance metrics as key predictors of robotic herniorrhaphy outcomes using iterative machine learning models: retrospective study.
Article in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Complexity and Postoperative Outcomes in Recurrent Versus Primary Incisional Hernias Following Elective Retromuscular Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Decoding surgical proficiency and complexity: a machine learning framework for robotic herniorrhaphy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Role of Robotic Surgery and Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Abdominal Wall Hernias: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRobotic data streams allow for capture of objective performance indicators, providing the ability to quantify and analyse operator technique and movement in optimizing postoperative outcomes. This study provided proof-of-concept demonstration of how intraoperative surgeon-factors could influence post-robotic herniorrhaphy complications via machine learning analyses of objective performance indicators. STUDY
designData on robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair were retrospectively reviewed between February 2013 and November 2022 at a single academic centre. Machine learning modelling on systematic chart review data correlated perioperative patient factors, intraoperative objective performance indicators, and postoperative outcomes. Complications were classified with the Clavien-Dindo scale. Endpoints of interest included postoperative complications at discharge, at postoperative day 30, and at the last follow-up. Machine learning models employed included linear, k-nearest neighbours, support vector, decision tree, random forest, adaptive boosting, and extreme gradient boosting regression algorithms.
resultsSome 520 patients undergoing robotic ventral hernia were included. Median age of patients was 56 years with 52.7% male and median body mass index 31.9 kg/m2. 92.7% of patients had at least one medical comorbidity peoperatively. Complications occurred in 33 (6.3%) patients at time of discharge. Machine learning models demonstrated an accuracy 0.95, a precision 0.92, a recall 0.95, and a F1 0.92 of objective performance indicator predicting complications and an accuracy 0.95, a precision 0.95, a recall 0.95, and a F1 0.94 by Clavien-Dindo grade at time of discharge. Thematic analyses of top ranked factors included operator-specific objective performance indicators alongside patient factors canonically associated with hernia complications.
conclusionsThis study showed the novel application of machine learning modelling to bridge objective performance indicators and clinical patient factors to postoperative clinical outcomes, demonstrating the relevance of dynamic intraoperative surgeon factors on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.