Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980068›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

From defensive reasoning to innovation: how digital tools foster positive emotions in organizations.

Guyang Tian, Yang Yang, Xue Zhang, Manlu Zhao, Yezhuang Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guyang TianHarbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Yang YangHarbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Xue ZhangShanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Manlu ZhaoHarbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Yezhuang TianHarbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China. tianyezhuang@hit.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities HIT.OCEF.2021021National Natural Science Foundation of China 71972062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers of organizational learning and innovation have frequently claimed that defensive reasoning is an inducer of negative emotions present in most organizations, inhibiting continuing innovation and development and individuals' effective learning. Although a significant amount of research has been conducted on the factors that reduce defensive reasoning in an organization, the breakthrough process and its outcomes have not yet been studied. This study uses narrative network analysis on longitudinal data from a Chinese tourist resort to explore how organizational factors-such as institutional environments, social media platforms, and virtual-reality role transformations-help employees overcome defensive reasoning and foster innovation. It demonstrates how digital management tools and corporate social platforms transform negative emotions into positive, creativity-enhancing actions. By analyzing individual defenses from both general and job position perspectives, the study introduces a comprehensive theoretical framework that highlights the role of emotional guidance and digital tools in reducing defensiveness, promoting collaboration, and improving organizational effectiveness and innovation.

Indexed as

CreativityEmotionsOrganizational CultureOrganizational InnovationAdultChinaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSocial MediaVirtual RealityCultivate innovationDefensive reasoningDigital management toolsNarrative networks analysisThe broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions

Identifiers

PMID39980068
PMCPMC11843981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.