Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980064›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025

Furthering the benefits of DBT for eating disorders: a lived experience correspondence on McColl et al.

James Downs

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

James DownsPatient Representative, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK. jamesldowns@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4321-8574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Correspondence article provides a lived experience perspective on McColl et al.'s study, which examines the use of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for individuals with eating disorders. Drawing on experiences of DBT treatment for longstanding and severe anorexia, the author critically engages with the study's findings, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of the treatment approach McColl et al. describe. While DBT has shown promise in addressing the emotional dysregulation and distress tolerance that underlie many eating disorder behaviours, the author emphasises the need for further adaptation to cater to the complexities of co-occurring physical, psychological, and neurodivergent conditions. The benefits of DBT for eating disorders are explored through personal reflections which emphasise the value and importance of skill-development, therapeutic validation, and motivation to build a "life worth living". Additional, co-produced research is required to further develop the evidence for DBT-based approaches, with particular attention needed in addressing language, stigma, cultural biases, and exclusionary research and clinical practices. Writing from a UK context, the author ends by advocating for the reinstatement of DBT within national guidelines for eating disorder treatment, highlighting its transdiagnostic relevance and potential to provide comprehensive, holistic support for those with more complex presentations.

Identifiers

PMID39980064
PMCPMC11844008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.