Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980058›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

The effects of a nutritional intervention on the sports nutrition knowledge and nutritional status of track and field athletes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Ranil Jayawardena, Kalani Weerasinghe, Indu Nanayakkara, Terrence Madhujith, Andrew P Hills, Nishan Sudheera Kalupahana

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ranil JayawardenaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka. ranil@physiol.cmb.ac.lk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7352-9365
Kalani WeerasingheHealth and Wellness Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-9714
Indu NanayakkaraDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-4239
Terrence MadhujithDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2821-5719
Andrew P HillsSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-7201
Nishan Sudheera KalupahanaDepartment of Nutrition and Health, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7129-5588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSports nutrition plays a crucial role in providing the fuel to meet the energy demands of athletes' training programmes, enhancing adaptations associated with training, and ensuring rapid recovery between workouts. However, evidence suggests that the dietary habits of many athletes are unsatisfactory when compared to sport-specific nutrition recommendations. This discrepancy is mainly due to a lack of up-to-date, evidence-based nutritional knowledge. Hence, this parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a 16-week evidence-based, culturally appropriate, personalized sports nutrition intervention on the sports nutrition knowledge and nutritional status of track and field athletes in Sri Lanka, in comparison to a control group that does not receive this intervention.

methodsElite and highly trained track and field athletes, competing at the national level and/or representing Sri Lanka in international competitions, will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group (IG) (n = 15) or the control group (CG) (n = 15). Participants in the IG will receive an evidence-based, culturally acceptable, personalized sports nutrition intervention from the principal investigator through one-to-one consultations at three-time points (zeroth, fourth, and eighth weeks), while participants in the CG will be followed up throughout the period without receiving the intervention. The primary outcome measure is the number of participants who achieve at least a 10% increase in mean sports nutrition knowledge (SNK) score at the end of the 16 DISCUSSION: While the primary objective is to enhance SNK, it is anticipated that improvements in nutritional status and overall health may significantly impact sports performance and career longevity of the athletes.

trial registrationSri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry, SLCTR/2024/013. Registered on 10

Indexed as

AthletesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNutritional StatusSports Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaSports Nutritional SciencesAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSri LankaTime FactorsSports nutritionSports nutrition knowledgeSports performanceTrack and field athletes

Identifiers

PMID39980058
PMCPMC11844149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.