ArticleBMC medical education2025
Exploring care quality in midwifery clinical practice settings in Ghana - a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-quality care is a significant factor in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. There are known barriers affecting midwives' ability to provide quality care in low- and middle-income countries. The presence of qualified and competent midwives, coupled with the elimination of barriers, is essential for enhancing care quality, especially in education program clinical practice settings.
aimTo explore factors that affect Ghanaian midwifery students' provision of high-quality care while on clinical rotation.
methodSix focus-group discussions were conducted with a total of 36 midwifery students in Accra, Ghana. Data were analyzed using deductive content analysis applying a conceptual framework identifying social, economic and professional factors influencing the provision of high-quality care.
resultsSocial factors identified patient resistance to student midwives, class-based discrimination, traditional practices being preferred over evidence-based care, communication barriers, and poor security. Economic factors were unexpected expenses and inadequate compensation. Professional factors were lack of necessary materials, insufficient number of staff, and a theory-practice gap between classroom learning and hands-on experiences.
conclusionFactors impacting Ghanaian midwifery students' ability to provide high-quality care in clinical settings were summarized, highlighting social, economic, and professional challenges. Key issues include patient resistance, class-based discrimination, inadequate compensation, theory-practice gaps, and lack of materials. The findings emphasize the need for improved support, resources, and quality clinical learning environments. There needs to be investment in infrastructure and prioritization of pedagogy in clinical settings to enhance midwifery education and care quality in Ghana and more broadly in low- and middle-income countries. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.