Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980000›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2025

Switching behavior and changes in smoking behavior by menthol cigarette preference and menthol heated tobacco product use among adults in the United States who smoke cigarettes: an actual use study.

Joshua L Karelitz, Yisha He, Elizabeth Becker, Andrea Vansickel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua L KarelitzCenter for Research and Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA. Joshua.L.Karelitz@altria.com.
Yisha HeCenter for Research and Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.
Elizabeth BeckerCenter for Research and Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.
Andrea VansickelCenter for Research and Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeated tobacco products (HTPs) deliver nicotine with significantly lower toxicant exposure relative to combustible cigarettes. HTPs may serve as viable tobacco harm reduction options for adults who smoke but are not able or interested in stopping consuming nicotine-containing products. There is limited information on the degree to which adults in the United States who smoke will switch away from or reduce combusted cigarette consumption when provided with HTPs, and none assessing differences due to menthol cigarette preference or menthol HTP use.

methodsIn a six-week actual use study of an HTP (IQOS®), adults in the United States, ages 21-64 (n = 615), who smoke combustible cigarettes and were not planning to quit were offered free choice of HTPs (one non-menthol and two menthol varieties) to use ad libitum. Preference for smoking menthol or non-menthol cigarettes was assessed upon study entry (374 menthol; 241 non-menthol). The number of HTP sticks and combusted cigarettes consumed were assessed via daily diary administered through smartphone application. Complete switching was defined on a seven-day point prevalence basis-reporting consuming zero combusted cigarettes while continuing to use the HTP research product in Week 6.

resultsOverall, 247 participants completely switched to HTP, corresponding to 21.1% of all those enrolled at baseline (n = 1173) or 40.2% of those included in primary analyses (n = 615). Among individuals included in primary analyses, we observed greater switching among those who preferred menthol versus non-menthol cigarettes (46.8% vs 29.9%). Probability of switching increased with greater proportional use of menthol versus non-menthol HTPs. Non-menthol cigarette-preferring participants had greater increases in switching when using proportionally more menthol than non-menthol HTPs; switching remained consistently high among menthol-preferring participants. Among participants who did not switch and continued smoking at Week 6, preference for menthol cigarettes and use of proportionally greater menthol versus non-menthol HTPs were each associated with greater reductions in cigarette consumption.

conclusionHTP use facilitated switching away from or reducing consumption of combusted cigarettes among adults who smoke, especially when using menthol HTPs. Most participants used menthol HTPs, regardless of their incoming preference for smoking menthol or non-menthol cigarettes. Availability of HTPs in menthol and non-menthol varieties offers an increased tobacco harm reduction opportunity over solely non-menthol by providing adults who smoke with smoke-free alternatives that they find appealing.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingMentholTobacco ProductsAdultFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmoking CessationUnited StatesYoung AdultMentholActual use behaviorHeated tobacco productsMentholSmoking reductionSwitching behaviorTobacco harm reduction

Identifiers

PMID39980000
PMCPMC11841305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.