ArticleBMC medical education2025
AI-powered standardised patients: evaluating ChatGPT-4o's impact on clinical case management in intern physicians.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of AI-Generated Content in Medical Education: Systematic Review of the Impact on Critical Thinking Abilities of Medical Students.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- AI-supported case-based learning in medical education: a comprehensive scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-powered virtual standardized patients in teaching history-taking skills to medical students: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Comparing AI chatbot simulation and peer role-play for OSCE preparation: a pilot randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Cloud-Based and Locally Deployed Language Models in Nursing and Health Care: An AI Act-Aligned Framework.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- What Platform Scores Miss: Multidimensional Evaluation of AI Teaching Agents in Medical Education.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions, needs, and expectations regarding large language model-based virtual patients: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- The application of large language models in orthopedic postgraduate education: potentials, challenges, and future prospects.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Comparison of large language models for clinical scenario generation in medical education: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Objective Structured Clinical Examination Generation in Digital Health Education: Comparative Analysis of Three GPT-4o Configurations.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Virtual patients and standardized patients combined training is associated with improved clinical reasoning among medical students.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Digital intelligence in dental technology education: curriculum and practical teaching reform.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of a Hybrid Case-Based Learning and Small-Group Teaching Model Using Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Case Generation: An Innovative Dental Education Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Large Language Model-Based Patient Simulation to Foster Communication Skills in Health Care Professionals: User-Centered Development and Usability Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Embracing the Future of Medical Education With Large Language Model-Based Virtual Patients: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- From Hype to Implementation: Embedding GPT-4o in Medical Education.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- ChatGPT in Oral Pathology: Bright Promise or Diagnostic Mirage.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Feasibility of an AI-Enabled Smart Mirror Integrating MA-rPPG, Facial Affect, and Conversational Guidance in Realtime.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- DIALOGUE: A Generative AI-Based Pre-Post Simulation Study to Enhance Diagnostic Communication in Medical Students Through Virtual Type 2 Diabetes Scenarios.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial Intelligence is currently being applied in healthcare for diagnosis, decision-making and education. ChatGPT-4o, with its advanced language and problem-solving capabilities, offers an innovative alternative as a virtual standardised patient in clinical training. Intern physicians are expected to develop clinical case management skills such as problem-solving, clinical reasoning and crisis management. In this study, ChatGPT-4o's served as virtual standardised patient and medical interns as physicians on clinical case management. This study aimed to evaluate intern physicians' competencies in clinical case management; problem-solving, clinical reasoning, crisis management and explore the impact and potential of ChatGPT-4o as a viable tool for assessing these competencies.
methodsThis study used a simultaneous triangulation design, integrating quantitative and qualitative data. Conducted at Aydın Adnan Menderes University, with 21 sixth-year medical students, ChatGPT-4o simulated realistic patient interactions requiring competencies in clinical case management; problem-solving, clinical reasoning, crisis management. Data were gathered through self-assessment survey, semi-structured interviews, observations of the students and ChatGPT-4o during the process. Analyses included Pearson correlation, Chi-square, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with content analysis conducted on qualitative data using MAXQDA software for coding.
resultsAccording to the findings, observation and self-assessment survey scores of intern physicians' clinical case management skills were positively correlated. There was a significant gap between participants' self-assessment and actual performance, indicating discrepancies in self-perceived versus real clinical competence. Participants reported feeling inadequate in their problem-solving and clinical reasoning competencies and experienced time pressure. They were satisfied with the Artificial Intelligence-powered standardised patient process and were willing to continue similar practices. Participants engaged with a uniform patient experience. Although participants were satisfied, the application process was sometimes negatively affected due to disconnection problems and language processing challenges.
conclusionsChatGPT-4o successfully simulated patient interactions, providing a controlled environment without risking harm to real patients for practicing clinical case management. Although some of the technological challenges limited effectiveness, it was useful, cost-effective and accessible. It is thought that intern physicians will be better supported in acquiring clinical management skills through varied clinical scenarios using this method. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.