ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Omics data integration analysis identified new biological insights into chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR).
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic relevance of PRSS2 and its immune correlates in papillary thyroid carcinoma.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the last two decades, many studies based on omics technologies have contributed to defining the clinical, immunological, and histological fingerprints of chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR), the leading cause of long-term kidney allograft failure. However, the full biological machinery underlying CAMR has only been partially defined, likely due to the fact thatsingle-omics technologies capture only specific aspects of the biological system and fail to provide a comprehensive understanding of this clinical complication.
methodsThis study integrated mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling of serum samples from 19 patients with clinical and histological evidence of CAMR and 26 kidney transplant recipients with normal graft function and histology (CTR) with transcriptomic analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from an independent cohort of 10 CAMR and 8 CTR patients. Data analysis was conducted using unsupervised hierarchical clustering (multidimensional scaling with k-means) and Spearman's correlation test. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) with the importance in projection (VIP) score identified key proteins differentiating CAMR from CTR. ELISA was used to validate the omics results.
resultsProteomic analysis identified 18 proteins that significantly differentiated CAMR from CTR (p < 0.01): five were more abundant (CHI3L1, LYZ, PRSS2, CPQ, IGLV3-32), while 13 were less abundant (SERPINA5, SERPING1, KNG1, CAMP, VNN1, BTD, WDR1, PON3, AHNAK2, MELTF, CA1, CD44, CUL1). Transcriptomic profiling revealed 6 downregulated and 33 upregulated genes in CAMR versus CTR (p < 0.01). Notably, only 2 biological elements were significantly deregulated in both omics analyses: chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1) and plasma protease inhibitor C1 (SERPING1). CHI3L1, previously associated with the severity of tissue damage in kidney diseases, was up-regulated in CAMR in both transcriptomics and proteomics, while SERPING1, a serine esterase inhibitor that blocks the classical and lectin pathway of complement, was up-regulated in CAMR in transcriptomics but down-regulated in proteomics. ELISA validated the omics results, and the ROC curve showed that CHI3L1 has good discrimination power between CAMR and CTR (AUC of ROC curve of 0.81).
conclusionsOur multi-omics data, although performed in a relatively small cohort of patients, revealed new systemic biological elements involved in the pathogenesis of CAMR and identified CHI3L1 as a new potential biomarker and/or therapeutic target for this important clinical complication. Future validation of these findings in larger patient cohorts should be conducted to better evaluate their clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.