Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979898›Full record

Trial reportBMC women's health2025

Efficacy and safety of vaginal suppositories containing combination of Natamycin and Lactulose in treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: international, randomized, controlled, superiority clinical trial (combination of Natamycin and Lactulose for treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis).

Oksana N Volkova, Elena V Amel'chenko, Oksana V Makeeva, Sergey A Tolmachev, Ekaterina A Lesovaya, Lefteris C Zacharia, Alexander V Dikovskiy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06411314 (Efficacy and Safety of Vaginal Suppositories Containing Combination of Natamycin and Lactulose in Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06411314 phase3completednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Vaginal Suppositories Containing Combination of Natamycin and Lactulose in Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: International, Randomized, Controlled, Superiority Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAvva Rus, JSCRan2022 to 2023Enrolled218ConditionsVulvovaginal Candidiasis, GenitalArmsNatamycin + Lactulose 100 mg + 300 mg vaginal suppositories, Lactulose 300 mg vaginal suppositories, Pimafucin® (natamycin) 100 mg vaginal suppositories
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oksana N VolkovaCity Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care of Minsk, Minsk, Belarus.
Elena V Amel'chenkoCity Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care of Minsk, Minsk, Belarus.
Oksana V MakeevaAVVA RUS JSC, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey A TolmachevAVVA RUS JSC, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina A LesovayaAVVA RUS JSC, Moscow, Russia.
Lefteris C ZachariaAVVA Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Limassol, Cyprus. zacharia.l@unic.ac.cy.
Alexander V DikovskiyAVVA Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Limassol, Cyprus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Natamycin + Lactulose vaginal suppositories (100 mg natamycin and 300 mg lactulose) (AVVA RUS JSC, Russia) in adult females with vulvovaginal candidiasis. METHODS AND

resultsAn international, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded clinical trial enrolled 218 females randomly distributed into three groups: Natamycin + Lactulose (92 patients), Lactulose (36 patients), and Pimafucin® (90 patients). The study drug and comparator drugs had an identical dosing regimen (one suppository intravaginally once a day at bedtime for six days). The study involved four visits to the study site with examination at Visits 2 and 3. The fixed-dose combination of Natamycin + Lactulose was superior to both comparator drugs in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint defined as the percentage of patients achieving a clinical recovery: the absence of symptoms of vulvovaginal candidiasis. At Visit 2, clinical recovery was reported in 81.6% of females in the Natamycin + Lactulose group compared to 42.9% and 62.3% of patients in the Lactulose and Pimafucin groups, respectively. The difference in proportions was 38.8% and 18.4%. In the Natamycin + Lactulose group, microscopic recovery was observed in 75.9% of patients at Visit 2 and in 90.8% of patients at Visit 3. In the Lactulose group, 45.7% and 74.3% subjects responded positively at Visits 2 and 3. In Pimafucin group, microscopic recovery was reported in 71.3% and 88.5% of patients at Visits 2 and 3, respectively, while no differences were observed between the Natamycin + Lactulose and Pimafucin groups at both visits. At Visit 3, the number of vaginal lactobacilli was significantly higher in the Natamycin + Lactulose group. In females with the low baseline content of vaginal lactobacilli, the combination drug under investigation increased the vaginal lactobacilli content to the reference values in 15.4% and 20.9% of patients at Visit 2 and Visit 3, respectively.

conclusionsThe fixed-dose combination Natamycin + Lactulose 100 mg + 300 mg vaginal suppositories (AVVA RUS JSC, Russia) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to 1) Pimafucin 100 mg and 2) Lactulose 300 mg vaginal suppositories in adult females with vulvovaginal candidiasis.

trial registrationNCT06411314, retrospectively registered on May, the 13th, 2024.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidiasis, VulvovaginalLactuloseNatamycinAdultDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSuppositoriesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntifungal AgentsDrug CombinationsLactuloseNatamycinSuppositoriesLactobacilliLactuloseNatamycinPrebioticVulvovaginal candidiasis

Identifiers

PMID39979898
PMCPMC11843759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.