Trial reportBMC psychiatry2025
Pilot randomised controlled trial on the feasibility and intervention satisfaction with an educational group programme for adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and their caregivers.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03547843 (The Effects of Peer Co-led Educational Group Intervention for Adults With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effects of Peer Co-led Educational Group Intervention for Adults With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Disorder
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a psychoeducational group intervention for adults diagnosed with ADHD: a pilot randomized controlled study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Feasibility of social media health education plus exercise in older adults with possible sarcopenia.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Co-Created Digital Pretherapy Psychoeducation for Outpatients in Specialized Mental Health Care: Usability Evaluation and Patient Satisfaction Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of a peer-led mindful self-compassion program for adults with eating disorder symptoms.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) study presents a patient-centred educational group programme collaboratively developed with user representatives and caregivers from two organisations and health personnel from a community mental health centre (CMHC). The objectives were to investigate the feasibility of the psychoeducational programme and the satisfaction of outpatients and caregivers with programme participation. This RCT explored the potential benefits of this innovative psychoeducational programme for adults recently diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
methodsThis pilot study employed a two-arm RCT design and recruited 60 outpatients from a Norwegian CMHC. The CMHC clinicians offered the intervention group (IG) participants a two-session, patient-centred, peer-cofacilitated programme along with the standard treatment. The control group (CG) received the standard treatment and a 1-h individual informational session during the same period. The recruitment, attendance, and dropout rate indicators were assessed for feasibility. Acceptability was assessed via the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire four-item scale (CSQ-4) and a three-item scale evaluating patient satisfaction with the information provided about ADHD. In addition, four patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were applied: one scale to assess self-efficacy, two to assess ADHD symptoms, and one for quality of life. The statistical analysis applied intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.
resultsIn total, 56 outpatients were divided into the IG (n = 30) or CG (n = 26), and the recruitment rate was 93.3%, with a dropout rate of 16%. The attendance rate was 92%, and the retention rates for the IG and CG were 56.6% and 76.9%, respectively. Concerning intervention satisfaction, the ITT analysis conducted using a linear mixed model revealed statistical improvements in satisfaction, with the scale measuring satisfaction with the information and the CSQ-4 scale. In addition, caregivers expressed high satisfaction with the programme, as measured by the CSQ-4 scale. Regarding PROMs, the ITT and PP analyses yielded mixed findings.
conclusionPreliminary evidence indicates that a two-session, patient-centred, peer-cofacilitated psychoeducational programme is feasible and well-received, with high ratings for satisfaction from outpatients and caregivers. CLINICLATRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03547843, 27/01/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.