ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Can a novel set of handgrips on a walking frame increase stability and support users when transferring to/from a chair?
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOne important aspect of walking aid use is transferring safely to the aid from sitting and transferring back to the chair after walking, since these activities have been associated with falls in older adults. Standard frames require their user to push off the chair or ask for help from a carer, which may over time lead to back pain. This study's aim was to assess whether novel handgrips located above the rear feet of a walking frame would facilitate safe transfer as compared to utilizing only the seat cushion or armrests of the chair.
methodsIn a gait lab-based trial 10 healthy older adults repeatedly transferred from sitting to standing, pushing off the chair's seat cushion, armrests, or using the new lower handles on the frame (alone or in combination with the seat cushion or armrest). The stability margin 'SM', defined as the distance between the centre of pressure and the nearest edge of the base of support for the user-device-chair system, was calculated as a mechanical measure of stability. Specifically, SM provides a measure of how close the system is to the point of tipping over. Additionally, 13 older frame users tried to use the new handgrips to transfer to/from the new frame and gave interviews which were thematically analysed.
resultsStability for the 10 healthy older adults was statistically either equivalent or better when using one or both handles on the novel frame as compared to pushing off the chair's seat cushion or armrests. Amongst the 13 older frame users the frame's new handgrips were useful to those living in the community and one person living in care, and they perceived them to facilitate independence and control. DISCUSSION &
conclusionsThe novel handgrips offer continuous support when getting up/sitting down and are well-received by those able to use them. The significance of the research lies in the reported number of falls during transfer from sitting to standing and vice versus, with underlying causes reported including loss of support. The proposed design is timely considering the documented increases in frailty and walking aid use in our ageing population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.