Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979842›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025

Optimized machine learning framework for cardiovascular disease diagnosis: a novel ethical perspective.

Ghadah Alwakid, Farman Ul Haq, Noshina Tariq, Mamoona Humayun, Momina Shaheen, Marwa Alsadun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ghadah AlwakidDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Farman Ul HaqDepartment of Computer Science, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Noshina TariqDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mamoona HumayunDepartment of Computing, School of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK. mamoona.humayun@roehampton.ac.uk.
Momina ShaheenDepartment of Computing, School of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK.
Marwa AlsadunDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Jouf University under grant No. (DGSSR-2024-02-02057) DGSSR-2024-02-02057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alignment of advanced cutting-edge technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a significant driving force to achieve greater precision and timeliness in identifying cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, it is difficult to achieve high accuracy and reliability in CVD diagnostics due to complex clinical data and the selection and modeling process of useful features. Therefore, this paper studies advanced AI-based feature selection techniques and the application of AI technologies in the CVD classification. It uses methodologies such as Chi-square, Info Gain, Forward Selection, and Backward Elimination as an essence of cardiovascular health indicators into a refined eight-feature subset. This study emphasizes ethical considerations, including transparency, interpretability, and bias mitigation. This is achieved by employing unbiased datasets, fair feature selection techniques, and rigorous validation metrics to ensure fairness and trustworthiness in the AI-based diagnostic process. In addition, the integration of various Machine Learning (ML) models, encompassing Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, Decision Trees (DT), and Logistic Regression (LR), facilitates a comprehensive exploration of predictive performance. Among this diverse range of models, XGBoost stands out as the top performer, achieving exceptional scores with a 99% accuracy rate, 100% recall, 99% F1-measure, and 99% precision. Furthermore, we venture into dimensionality reduction, applying Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to the eight-feature subset, effectively refining it to a compact six-attribute feature subset. Once again, XGBoost shines as the model of choice, yielding outstanding results. It achieves accuracy, recall, F1-measure, and precision scores of 98%, 100%, 98%, and 97%, respectively, when applied to the feature subset derived from the combination of Chi-square and Forward Selection methods.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDecision Support TechniquesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningDecision TreesHumansPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceCardiovascular diseasesChi-squareDecision treesFeature selectionK-nearest neighboursLogistic regressionMachine learningPrincipal component analysisRandom forestXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID39979842
PMCPMC11844188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.