ArticleBMC cancer2025
Pathology-based deep learning features for predicting basal and luminal subtypes in bladder cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pan-cancer Distant Metastasis Prediction Based on Graph Neural Network.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Integrative molecular-radiopathomic characterization of AIRE-driven immune subtypes in bladder cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Semi-supervised medical image segmentation of bladder tumors based on supervised branches and uncertainty estimation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical-grade AI model for molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer: a multi-center cohort study in China.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Article
- Integrating transcriptomics, single-cell omics, and deep learning-based histopathological features to identifyTranslational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Luminal and Basal Subtypes Across Carcinomas: Molecular Programs Beyond Tissue of Origin.Cancers · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven approaches in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: integrating endocrine-metabolic profiling for enhanced diagnostics and therapeutics.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Computational pathology in bladder cancer: A scoping review.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Review
- Global trends in the use of artificial intelligence for urological tumor histopathology: A 20-year bibliometric analysis.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBladder cancer (BLCA) exists a profound molecular diversity, with basal and luminal subtypes having different prognostic and therapeutic outcomes. Traditional methods for molecular subtyping are often time-consuming and resource-intensive. This study aims to develop machine learning models using deep learning features from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) to predict basal and luminal subtypes in BLCA.
methodsRNA sequencing data and clinical outcomes were downloaded from seven public BLCA databases, including TCGA, GEO datasets, and the IMvigor210C cohort, to assess the prognostic value of BLCA molecular subtypes. WSIs from TCGA were used to construct and validate the machine learning models, while WSIs from Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (STPH) and The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University (GD2H) were used as external validations. Deep learning models were trained to obtained tumor patches within WSIs. WSI level deep learning features were extracted from tumor patches based on the RetCCL model. Support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR) were developed using these features to classify basal and luminal subtypes.
resultsKaplan-Meier survival and prognostic meta-analyses showed that basal BLCA patients had significantly worse overall survival compared to luminal BLCA patients (hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-1.73, P < 0.001). The LR model based on tumor patch features selected by Resnet50 model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 in the internal validation set, and 0.81 and 0.64 in the external validation sets from STPH and GD2H, respectively. This model outperformed both junior and senior pathologists in the differentiation of basal and luminal subtypes (AUC: 0.85, accuracy: 74%, sensitivity: 66%, specificity: 82%).
conclusionsThis study showed the efficacy of machine learning models in predicting the basal and luminal subtypes of BLCA based on the extraction of deep learning features from tumor patches in H&E-stained WSIs. The performance of the LR model suggests that the integration of AI tools into the diagnostic process could significantly enhance the accuracy of molecular subtyping, thereby potentially informing personalized treatment strategies for BLCA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.