Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979816›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Profiling conserved transcription factor binding motifs in Phaseolus vulgaris through comparative genomics.

Liudmyla Kondratova, C Eduardo Vallejos, Ana Conesa

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liudmyla KondratovaGenetics & Genomics Graduate Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
C Eduardo VallejosGenetics & Genomics Graduate Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. vallejos@ufl.edu.
Ana ConesaInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology, Spanish National Research Council, Paterna, Spain. ana.conesa@csic.es.

Funding

NSF IOS-2031336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), a staple food in Latin America and Africa, serves as a vital source of energy, protein, and essential minerals for millions of people. However, genomics knowledge that breeders could leverage for improvement of this crop is scarce. We have developed and validated a comparative genomics approach to predict conserved transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) in common bean and studied gene regulatory networks. We analyzed promoter regions and identified TFBS for 12,631 bean genes with an average of 6 conserved motifs per gene. Moreover, we discovered a statistically significant relationship between the number of conserved motifs and amount of available experimental evidence of gene regulation. Notably, ERF, MYB, and bHLH transcription factor families dominated conserved motifs, with implications for starch biosynthesis regulation. Furthermore, we provide gene regulatory data as a resource that can be interrogated for the regulatory landscape of any set of genes. Our results underscore the significance of TFBS conservation in legumes and aligns with the notion that core genes often exhibit a more conserved regulatory makeup. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of a comparative genomics approach for addressing genome information gaps in non-model organisms and provides valuable insights into the regulatory networks governing starch biosynthesis genes that can support crop improvement programs.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceGenomicsPhaseolusTranscription FactorsBinding SitesGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksPlant ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsCommon beanComparative genomicsNon-model organismsP. vulgarisRegulatory networksTranscription factor binding sites conservation

Identifiers

PMID39979816
PMCPMC11841308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.