Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
The application of reinforced endotracheal tubes with pressure indicators in preventing postoperative airway-related complications in neurosurgical patients: a randomized controlled study.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational study on the application of different esketamine gargle doses for the prevention of postoperative sore throat after laryngeal mask airway insertion.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Regarding effect of different head position during tracheal intubation on postoperative sore throat: a randomized clinical trial.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Postoperative Sore Throat After Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Narrative Review and Call for Action.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExcessive cuff pressure can lead to complications associated with endotracheal intubation. This study aims to compare the effects of cuff inflation guided by a pressure indicator versus the tactile estimation method on postoperative airway-related complications in neurosurgical patients.
methodsThis study employed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled design. Blinding was implemented for the subjects and data collectors. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group used tracheal tubes with pressure indicators. The control group used standard reinforced tracheal tubes. The primary outcome measure was the score of tracheal mucosal injury in two groups of subjects under bronchoscopy assistance with extubation. Secondary outcome measures included: (1) the incidence of tracheal mucosal injury assessed by bronchoscopy at the time of extubation; (2) the incidence of blood-stained cuff during extubation; (3) the incidence and severity of sore throat, and the incidence of hoarseness, blood-stained sputum, and coughing at 1 h and 24 h post-extubation.
resultsThe intervention group demonstrated a significantly lower tracheal mucosal injury score before extubation compared to controls (1.4 ± 0.274 vs. 2.7 ± 0.335; P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in immediate post-extubation complications or short-term (1-hour) postoperative symptoms. Notably, while the majority of 24-hour post-extubation outcomes remained comparable between groups, the intervention group exhibited significantly reduced sore throat severity at this timepoint (P = 0.044).
conclusionThe use of tracheal tubes with pressure indicators to control intraoperative cuff pressure could reduce postoperative airway mucosal damage in neurosurgical patients and alleviated post-extubation pharyngeal pain after 24 h.
trial registrationChiCTR2200065315, first registered on 02/11/2022. The study was retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.