ArticleDrug safety2025
Leveraging FDA Labeling Documents and Large Language Model to Enhance Annotation, Profiling, and Classification of Drug Adverse Events with AskFDALabel.
Article in Drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Regulatory Science: Opportunities, Challenges, and Emerging Frameworks.The AAPS journal · 2026Review
- Large Language Models in Adverse Drug Reaction Detection and Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The emerging role of artificial intelligence in drug-induced liver injury research: Current innovations.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2026Article
- Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for Evaluating Regulatory Compliance of Drug Information and Clinical Trial Protocols.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for Natural Language Querying of Immunogenicity Data for Protein Drugs.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Prompt-to-Pill: Multi-Agent Drug Discovery and Clinical Simulation Pipeline.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Detecting Adverse Drug Events in Social Media: A Brief Literature Review.SN computer science · 2026Article
- Thromboembolic events with olanzapine: a systematic review integrating meta-analysis and FAERS database.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Application and Prospects of Large Language Models in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Emerging analytical techniques for lipid profiling in food products: insights into processing effects and quality control.Food chemistry: X · 2025Review
- PVLens: Enhancing Pharmacovigilance Through Automated Label Extraction.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug adverse events (AEs) represent a significant public health concern. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labeling documents are an essential resource for studying drug safety such as assessing a drug's likelihood to cause certain organ toxicities; however, the manual extraction of AEs is labor-intensive, requires specialized expertise, and is challenging to maintain, due to frequent updates of the labeling documents.
objectiveTo automate the extraction of AE data from FDA drug labeling documents, we developed a workflow based on AskFDALabel, a large language model (LLM)-powered framework, and its demonstration in drug safety studies.
methodsThis framework incorporates a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) component based on FDALabel to enhance standard LLM inference. Key steps include (1) selection of a task-specific template, (2) FDALabel database querying, and (3) content preparation for LLM processing. We evaluated the performance of the framework in three benchmark experiments, including drug-induced liver injury (DILI) classification, drug-induced cardiotoxicity (DICT) classification, and AE term recognition.
resultsAskFDALabel achieved F1-scores of 0.978 for DILI, 0.931 for DICT, and 0.911 for AE annotation, outperforming other traditional methods. It also provided cited labeling content and detailed explanations, facilitating manual verification.
conclusionAskFDALabel exhibited high consistency with human AE annotation, particularly in classifying and profiling DILI and DICT. Thus, it can significantly enhance the efficiency and accuracy of AE annotation, with promising potential for advanced AE surveillance and drug safety research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.