Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979771›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2025

Leveraging FDA Labeling Documents and Large Language Model to Enhance Annotation, Profiling, and Classification of Drug Adverse Events with AskFDALabel.

Leihong Wu, Hong Fang, Yanyan Qu, Joshua Xu, Weida Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. PVLens: Enhancing Pharmacovigilance Through Automated Label Extraction.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leihong WuDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. FDA, 3900 NCTR Rd, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA. leihong.wu@fda.hhs.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4093-3708
Hong FangOffice of Scientific Coordination, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. FDA, 3900 NCTR Rd, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA.
Yanyan QuDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. FDA, 3900 NCTR Rd, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA.
Joshua XuDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. FDA, 3900 NCTR Rd, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA.
Weida TongDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. FDA, 3900 NCTR Rd, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug adverse events (AEs) represent a significant public health concern. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labeling documents are an essential resource for studying drug safety such as assessing a drug's likelihood to cause certain organ toxicities; however, the manual extraction of AEs is labor-intensive, requires specialized expertise, and is challenging to maintain, due to frequent updates of the labeling documents.

objectiveTo automate the extraction of AE data from FDA drug labeling documents, we developed a workflow based on AskFDALabel, a large language model (LLM)-powered framework, and its demonstration in drug safety studies.

methodsThis framework incorporates a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) component based on FDALabel to enhance standard LLM inference. Key steps include (1) selection of a task-specific template, (2) FDALabel database querying, and (3) content preparation for LLM processing. We evaluated the performance of the framework in three benchmark experiments, including drug-induced liver injury (DILI) classification, drug-induced cardiotoxicity (DICT) classification, and AE term recognition.

resultsAskFDALabel achieved F1-scores of 0.978 for DILI, 0.931 for DICT, and 0.911 for AE annotation, outperforming other traditional methods. It also provided cited labeling content and detailed explanations, facilitating manual verification.

conclusionAskFDALabel exhibited high consistency with human AE annotation, particularly in classifying and profiling DILI and DICT. Thus, it can significantly enhance the efficiency and accuracy of AE annotation, with promising potential for advanced AE surveillance and drug safety research.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug LabelingDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDatabases, FactualHumansLarge Language ModelsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID39979771
PMCPMC12098182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.