ReviewPaediatric drugs2025
Meningococcal Vaccination in the United States: Past, Present, And Future.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Evolving Epidemiology and Implications for Prevention Policy.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Long-Term Impacts of Invasive Meningococcal Disease on Survivors and Their Caregivers in the United States and Canada.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningococcal disease is rare but serious, often striking previously healthy adolescents or young adults, with substantial morbidity and mortality. The incidence of meningococcal disease in the USA declined even prior to the issuance of routine recommendations for vaccination, although an uptick in incidence has occurred since 2022. Routine recommendations for adolescent MenACWY vaccination were issued in 2005, and recommendations for adolescent MenB vaccination based on shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) were issued in 2015. Although meningococcal vaccines are safe and effective, their limited duration of protection coupled with low disease incidence result in a high cost per case averted by vaccination, most notably with MenB vaccines. The low cost-effectiveness raises ethical concerns about resource use and the role of economic analyses in policy decisions. However, the potential for substantial public health impact remains. Outer membrane vesicle (OMV)-containing MenB vaccines provide some protection against gonorrhea infections. The recent development of pentavalent ABCWY vaccines provide the opportunity to reduce the number of injections and simplify implementation, provided MenACWY and MenB vaccine schedules are harmonized. Vaccine attributes, implementation issues, and resource utilization will be important considerations in optimization of the US adolescent meningococcal vaccination strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39979767What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.