ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Development of an Automated CAD System for Lesion Detection in DCE-MRI.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive ensemble learning for prostate cancer classification on multi-modal MRI: reducing unnecessary biopsies.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has been recognized as an effective tool for early detection and characterization of breast lesions. This study proposes an automated computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to facilitate lesion detection in DCE-MRI. The system initially identifies and crops the breast tissue reducing the processed image region and, thus, resulting in lower computational burden. Then, Otsu's multilevel thresholding method is applied to detect and segment the suspicious regions of interest (ROIs), considering the dynamic enhancement changes across two post-contrast sequential phases. After segmentation, a two-stage false positive reduction process is applied. A rule-based stage is first applied, followed by the segmentation of control ROIs in the contralateral breast. A feature vector is then extracted from all ROIs and supervised classification is implemented using two classifiers (feed-forward backpropagation neural network (FFBPN) and support vector machine (SVM)). A dataset of 52 DCE-MRI exams was used for assessing the performance of the system in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision. A total of 138 enhancing lesions were identified by an experienced radiologist and corresponded to CAD-detected ROIs. The system's overall sensitivity was 83% when the FFBPN classifier was used and 92% when the SVM was applied. Moreover, the calculated area under curve for the SVM classifier was 0.95. Both employed classifiers exhibited high performance in identifying enhancing lesions and in differentiating them from healthy parenchyma. Current results suggest that the employment of a CAD system can expedite lesion detection in DCE-MRI images and, therefore, further research over larger datasets is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.