ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
A New Method Using Deep Learning to Predict the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Method of Modeling the Multi-stage Decision-Making Process of CRT Using Machine Learning with Uncertainty Quantification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Mask of Truth: Model Sensitivity to Unexpected Regions of Medical Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical phenotypes among patients that underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy using unsupervised learning integrating gated SPECT.Nuclear medicine communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical parameters measured from gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI) have value in predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patient outcomes, but still show limitations. The purpose of this study is to combine clinical variables, features from electrocardiogram (ECG), and parameters from assessment of cardiac function with polar maps from gated SPECT MPI through deep learning (DL) to predict CRT response. A total of 218 patients who underwent rest-gated SPECT MPI were enrolled in this study. CRT response was defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 5% at a 6-month follow-up. A DL model was constructed by combining a pre-trained VGG16 model and a multilayer perceptron. Two modalities of data were input to the model: polar map images from SPECT MPI and tabular data from clinical features, ECG parameters, and SPECT-MPI-derived parameters. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was applied to the VGG16 model to provide explainability for the polar maps. For comparison, four machine learning (ML) models were trained using only the tabular features. Modeling was performed on 218 patients who underwent CRT implantation with a response rate of 55.5% (n = 121). The DL model demonstrated average AUC (0.83), accuracy (0.73), sensitivity (0.76), and specificity (0.69) surpassing ML models and guideline criteria. Guideline recommendations achieved accuracy (0.53), sensitivity (0.75), and specificity (0.26). The DL model trended towards improvement over the ML models, showcasing the additional predictive benefit of utilizing SPECT MPI polar maps. Incorporating additional patient data directly in the form of medical imagery can improve CRT response prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.