ArticleNeurocritical care2025
System for Predicting Neurological Outcomes Following Cardiac Arrest Based on Clinical Predictors Using a Machine Learning Method: The Neurological Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest Method.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal contrastive prognostication framework for early neurological outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Precision Critical Care: A Scoping Review.Health data science · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in acute and critical care: current challenges and strategic solutions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA multimodal approach may prove effective for predicting clinical outcomes following cardiac arrest (CA). We aimed to develop a practical predictive model that incorporates clinical factors related to CA and multiple prognostic tests using machine learning methods.
methodsThe neurological outcomes after CA (NOCA) method for predicting poor outcomes were developed using data from 390 patients with CA between May 2018 and June 2023. The outcome was poor neurological outcome, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 3-5 at discharge. We analyzed 31 variables describing the circumstances at CA, demographics, comorbidities, and prognostic studies. The prognostic method was developed based on an extreme gradient-boosting algorithm with threefold cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization. The performance of the predictive model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and calculating the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsOf the 390 total patients (mean age 64.2 years; 71.3% male), 235 (60.3%) experienced poor outcomes at discharge. We selected variables to predict poor neurological outcomes using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. The Glasgow Coma Scale-M (best motor response), electroencephalographic features, the neurological pupil index, time from CA to return of spontaneous circulation, and brain imaging were found to be important key parameters in the NOCA score. The AUC of the NOCA method was 0.965 (95% confidence interval 0.941-0.976).
conclusionsThe NOCA score represents a simple method for predicting neurological outcomes, with good performance in patients with CA, using a machine learning analysis that incorporates widely available variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39979708What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.