ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Whiteboards to Facilitate Hospitalized Patient Communication, Safety, and Education: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Patient to Person: An EHR-Integrated "About Me" Tool Allows Patients to Digitally Share Non-Medical Information.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Experiences and Needs of Core Participants in Surgical Ward Rounds: Qualitative Exploratory Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBedside whiteboards are ubiquitous fixtures in hospitalized patients' rooms and present unique, low-cost opportunities to improve patient care. Specifically, bedside whiteboards may enhance communication practices, safety standards, and patient education. Despite their commonality at the bedside, the direct impact of whiteboards on patient care remains unclear.
objectiveTo perform a scoping review of medical literature to synthesize available evidence and identify gaps regarding the impact of bedside whiteboards on patient communication, safety, and education. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Published articles evaluating the impact of physical, patient-facing whiteboards on patient communication, safety, and education for adult patients hospitalized on medical-surgical floors and intensive care units. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: MEDLINE via PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases. CHARTING
methodsWe performed a scoping review using Mak and Thomas' Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Two reviewers independently performed database searches on relevant publications that evaluated the impact of whiteboard-based interventions on communication practices, safety standards, and patient education.
resultsThirteen articles were included in the final analysis. Studies were conducted on general medicine-specific units (n = 9, 69%) or medicine-surgery inpatient units (n = 3, 23%). Twelve of the 13 studies evaluated patient communication metrics, including provider identification (n = 9), patient engagement in care plan (n = 6), patient-provider communication (n = 3), interprofessional communication (n = 1), and discharge date estimation (n = 4). Six of these studies showed a statistically significant improvement in some aspect of patient communication. Patient safety metrics and education efforts were rarely included in whiteboard-based interventions, with only 2 studies exploring each aspect, respectively.
conclusionsMost studies focused on whiteboards to facilitate patient communication, with 4 studies showing 6 statistically significant improvements. Our scoping review highlights a paucity of research evaluating how whiteboard-based interventions could enhance patient safety and education, and future studies are necessary to explore this potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.