Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979688›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Machine Learning-Driven Modeling to Predict Postdischarge Venous Thromboembolism After Pancreatectomy for Pancreas Cancer.

Kaleem S Ahmed, Sheriff M Issaka, Clayton T Marcinak, Sehar S Virani, Taylor Jaraczewski, Majid Afshar, Anoop Mayampurath, Matthew M Churpek, Jomol Mathew, Syed Nabeel Zafar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kaleem S Ahmed *Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UW Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Sheriff M Issaka *Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UW Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Clayton T MarcinakDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UW Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Sehar S ViraniDepartment of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Taylor JaraczewskiDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, WI, USA.
Majid AfsharDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Anoop MayampurathDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Matthew M ChurpekDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Jomol MathewDepartment of Informatics and Information Technology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Syed Nabeel ZafarDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UW Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. zafars@surgery.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3843-9687

Funding

NIH/NCI Early-Stage Surgeon Scientist Program Grant P30 CA014520-48S4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostdischarge venous thromboembolism (pdVTE) is a life-threatening complication following resection for pancreatic cancer (PC). While national guidelines recommend extended chemoprophylaxis for all, adherence is low and ranges from 1.5 to 44%. Predicting a patient's pdVTE risk would enable a more tailored approach to extended chemoprophylaxis, better balancing the cost and risks of overtreatment. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using machine learning models to predict pdVTE. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed data from patients undergoing pancreatectomy for PC using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2014 and 2020. Predictive classification models were trained and independently tested on features available at the time of discharge including demographics, clinical, laboratory, cancer, and surgery-specific variables. We developed and compared logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting (GB) models to predict the development of pdVTE. Model performance and feature importance were evaluated.

resultsThe study included a total of 51,916 patients, with 743 (1.4%) experiencing pdVTE. The best-performing GB, RF, and DT models achieved area under the curve (AUC) scores of 0.83, 0.80, and 0.80, respectively, demonstrating superior performance compared with the traditional LR (AUC = 0.72) model. The GB model achieved a specificity of 99%, sensitivity of 0.40%, and area under the precision recall curve of 0.34. The most important variables were intraoperative antibiotic use, blood transfusion, length of stay, and postoperative infections.

conclusionsMachine learning models can reliably identify patients who are at high risk for pdVTE. Such models should be used to inform prescription of extended VTE prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsVenous ThromboembolismAgedDecision TreesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsClinical decision supportMachine learningPancreatectomyPancreatic cancerRisk predictionVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.