Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979653›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025

Pyoderma gangrenosum refined elements for core item selection and evaluation (PRECISE-PG): a study protocol for reaching consensus on core outcome domain items in clinical trials of pyoderma gangrenosum.

Tayler Tobey, Alex G Ortega-Loayza, Sharon I Choe, Olivia Haddadin, Federico Bardazzi, David O Croitoru, Diana M Chen, Morgan Vague, Valentina Dini, Philip J Hampton and 14 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Tayler TobeySchool of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Alex G Ortega-LoayzaDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3303 S. Bond Avenue, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Sharon I ChoeSchool of Medicine, Creighton University Phoenix Regional Campus, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Olivia HaddadinSchool of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Federico BardazziDepartment of Dermatology, Dermatology Unit Azienda Ospedaliera San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
David O CroitoruDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Diana M ChenGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Morgan VagueDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3303 S. Bond Avenue, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Valentina DiniDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Philip J HamptonDepartment of Dermatology, The Royal Victoria Infirmary, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
William T HuangDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Mihaly ImrePharmacy, Science, and Technology of Târgu Mureş (UMPhST), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Robert I KellyDepartment of Dermatology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.
Fnu NutanDepartment of Dermatology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Sheila ShaiganyDepartment of Dermatology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Hadir ShakshoukDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3303 S. Bond Avenue, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Jenny Belén Altamirano JaraDepartment of Dermatology, Aristarcho Pessoa Central Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Barbara NolanUPGRADE Initiative, Portland, USA.
Tammi ZeiterUPGRADE Initiative, Portland, USA.
Antonios G A KoliosDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Arash MostaghimiDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Benjamin H KaffenbergerDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Cecilia A C PrinsenCHORD COUSIN Collaboration, Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael E JacobsonDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3303 S. Bond Avenue, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. Jacobsmi@ohsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a debilitating inflammatory skin condition characterized by painful, necrotic ulcers, significantly impairing patient quality of life. The variability in clinical outcomes and the lack of standardized treatment protocols challenge effective PG clinical management and research. The Understanding Pyoderma Gangrenosum, Review and Assessment of Disease Effects (UPGRADE) project seeks to address this gap by establishing a core outcome set (COS) for PG clinical trials. UPGRADE has reached consensus on three core outcome domains: Pain, Quality of Life, and Clinical Signs. Here we describe a protocol detailing the next steps of UPGRADE's COS development to employ an international multistakeholder modified Delphi consensus process to reach consensus on the content of each core domain through the identification and definition of core domain-specific domain items. The process outlined in this protocol will involve generating domain items from the existing literature, refining these items through iterative e-Delphi surveys, and finalizing them in a consensus meeting. This work will enhance the granularity of these domains and facilitate more precise outcome measurement in clinical trials. The development of these detailed domain items is crucial for standardizing outcome reporting across PG trials, thereby improving research quality and enabling better treatment strategies, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CarePyoderma GangrenosumConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansPainQuality of LifeResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeCore domainsCore outcome set (COS) developmentDelphi consensus processPyoderma gangrenosum

Identifiers

PMID39979653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.