Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979629›Full record

Observational studyEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Non-melanoma skin cancer of the external auditory canal: long-term outcomes of a tertiary head and neck unit.

Eleanor Apthorp, Rebecca Lam, Rupert Obholzer, Jean-Pierre Jeannon, Richard Oakley, Aleix Rovira

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eleanor ApthorpGKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, Guy's Campus, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 1UL, UK. ellieapthorp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4662-4180
Rebecca LamGKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, Guy's Campus, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
Rupert ObholzerDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Jean-Pierre JeannonDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Richard OakleyDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Aleix RoviraDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExternal auditory canal (EAC) skin cancer is often diagnosed at advanced stages, leading to poor survival outcomes. Our study aims to describe disease characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with EAC cancer, increasing understanding of the management of this rare disease.

methodsRetrospective, observational study including patients with non-melanoma EAC skin cancer treated at Guy's and St Thomas' Head and Neck Unit from 2012 to 2021, with follow-up until October 2023. Patient with EAC or auricular primaries extending into the EAC were included. Demographic, histopathological, and surgical data were obtained from electronic records.

resultsThirty-eight patients were included, 86.8% treated with curative intent. The median follow-up was 49.9 months. One, three, and five-year overall survival for patients treated curatively were 100%, 96.9% and 75.3%, respectively, versus 40.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% for palliative. 68.4% had advanced disease (Pittsburgh staging, III: 18.4%, IV: 50.0%). 39.5% were treated after recurrent or persistent disease. Histological subtypes included squamous cell carcinoma (60.5%), basal cell carcinoma (26.3%) and others (13.2%). Among those treated surgically (n = 31), 74.2% underwent lateral temporal bone resection and 29.0% wide local excision. 83.9% had parotidectomy, neck dissection or both. 51.6% received post-operative radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. Advanced stage was significantly associated with reduced overall survival (p = 0.05) but not disease-free survival (p = 0.25). No primary site features, regional metastasis (p = 0.63), direct parotid invasion (p = 0.71) or age (p = 0.15) significantly impacted survival.

conclusionAccording to the good outcomes reported, this study suggests lowering the threshold for radical treatment may improve outcomes for patients with potentially poor prognostic features.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaEar CanalEar NeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeExternal auditory canal carcinomaLateral temporal bone resection

Identifiers

PMID39979629
PMCPMC12321918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.