Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979626›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Patient-centred outcome following endoscopic management of benign central airway obstruction.

Mads Bøgh, Dalia Gustaityté Larsen, Matilde Lonka, Sten Schytte, Ulrik Pedersen, Søren Gade, Padraig O'Leary, Thomas Kjaergaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mads BøghOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Dalia Gustaityté LarsenOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Matilde LonkaOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sten SchytteOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ulrik PedersenOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren GadeOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Padraig O'LearyOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas KjaergaardOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. thokjaer@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5090-4812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine patient-centred outcome following endoscopic treatment of central airway stenosis in terms of days alive and out of hospital (DAOH), need for re-intervention, and complications, with reference to aetiology of disease and applied treatment methodology.

methodsAnalyses were based on data from consecutive adult patients treated endoscopically for benign central airway obstruction at Aarhus University Hospital from 2012 to 2022, with a minimum follow-up of one year. DAOH was calculated for 30 and 365 days. Complications were graded based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors for DAOH, re-intervention and complications.

results82 consecutive adult patients underwent endoscopic treatment during the period of inclusion, comprising a total of 175 dilatations, 42 benign tumour resections, and 67 stent insertions. Multiple interventions and short re-intervention intervals was more likely amongst patients reporting significant preoperative dyspnoea or requiring preoperative respiratory support, as well as patients treated with endoscopic insertion of silicone stents. The overall complication rate per procedure was 11.7%, and complications were more likely to occur in patients with high age, high BMI and comorbidity. Overall DAOH during the first year after intervention was 343 days, lowest amongst patients with tracheobronchomalacia or severe airway stenosis, and in those who underwent endoscopic stent insertion.

conclusionEndoscopic treatment is a safe and viable intervention in the management of benign central airway obstruction in adults with few complications and a high overall outcome.

Indexed as

Airway ObstructionEndoscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeBenignCentral airway obstructionPatient-relevant outcomePostoperative complicationsTherapeutic bronchoscopyTracheobronchomalacia

Identifiers

PMID39979626
PMCPMC11950132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.