Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979619›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2025

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with self-fixated meshes: a randomized controlled trial.

Anna-Maria Thölix, Jyrki Kössi, Marie Grönroos-Korhonen, Jukka Harju

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05091853 (Laparscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Does the Choice of Self-fixated Mesh Matter?), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05091853 nacompletednot on this map

Laparscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Does the Choice of Self-fixated Mesh Matter?

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelsinki University Central HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled174ConditionsInguinal Hernia, SurgeryArmsAdhesix mesh
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna-Maria ThölixDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. anna-maria.tholix@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-0343-427X
Jyrki KössiDepartment of Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Marie Grönroos-KorhonenDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jukka HarjuDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery leads to rapid recovery and low complication rates. An alternative to fixate the mesh is using a self-fixated mesh.

methodsFrom April 2021 to June 2024, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing self-adhesive mesh (Adhesix™) with self-gripping mesh (Progrip™) in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery (TAPP and TEP). Adult patients scheduled for day surgery were included in the study with a 1-year follow up. The primary endpoint was the number of analgesics (Paracetamol or Ibuprofen) used during the first post-operative week. Secondary outcomes were pain-related issues, complications, and recurrence rate.

resultsA total of 174 patients participated; 90 received Adhesix™ (group A) and 84 Progrip™ (Group P). Forty-six (26.4%) patients had recurrent hernia, 68 (39.1%) had unilateral and 60 (34.5%) had bilateral primary hernias. A total of 156 (90%) patients completed follow up. The number of analgesics during the first post-operative week was comparable between groups (P 22.9, A 21.2 tablets, p = 0.461). Group P used more analgesics during day 1, after which no difference was observed. In general, all participants used analgesics after surgery regularly for 10.8 days (SD 10.6) and occasionally for 15.9 days (SD 16.9). Time to return to work and normal activities was 16.1 days (SD 10.8) and 16.6 days (SD 9.6), respectively. More patients in group P reported moderate or severe pain (numeric rating scale > 3) during exercise 3 months after surgery (P 15.4%, A 3.1%, p = 0.035), although no difference was observed at 1 year after surgery. Both groups had significantly improved quality of life measures in physical aspects of the RAND-36 Item Health Survey after 3 months. Two recurrences, one in each group (1.1%) occurred.

conclusionThe use of Adhesix was non-inferior to Progrip in laparoscopic surgery. Surgery using either mesh led to rapid recovery and improved quality of life. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05091853).

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyPostoperative PainSurgical MeshAdultAgedAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeInguinal herniaLaparoscopic repairMesh fixation

Identifiers

PMID39979619
PMCPMC11933136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.