Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979610›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2025

Five-year follow-up with the PreserFlo MicroShunt for open-angle glaucoma.

Lotte M J Scheres, Stefani Kujovic-Aleksov, Bjorn Winkens, Ronald M P C de Crom, Carroll A B Webers, Henny J M Beckers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Preserflo microshunt outcomes in pigmentary glaucoma: a propensity score-matched comparison with primary open-angle glaucoma.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Comparative One-Year Outcomes of T-HookJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Preserflo MicroShunt in refractory glaucoma: multicentre european results with up to three years of follow-up.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  6. Should We Fear Wipe-Out in Glaucoma Surgery?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lotte M J ScheresUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, the Netherlands. lotte.scheres@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0262-0540
Stefani Kujovic-AleksovUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Bjorn WinkensDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ronald M P C de CromUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Carroll A B WebersUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Henny J M BeckersUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9406-1426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report on five-year results with the PreserFlo MicroShunt (MicroShunt) for the surgical treatment of open-angle glaucoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsRetrospective case series of consecutive patients who underwent a stand-alone MicroShunt implantation at the University Eye Clinic of Maastricht. If a patient underwent the procedure in both eyes, only the first eye was included in the analysis. MicroShunt implantation was augmented with 0.2 mg/ml mitomycin-C. The primary outcome was intraocular pressure (IOP) during follow-up. Furthermore, information on IOP-lowering medication use, success rates, reoperation rates, and postoperative complications was collected.

resultsSixty-six eyes were included for analyses. Diagnoses included primary open-angle glaucoma (88%) and pigmentary glaucoma (12%). The majority of patients had moderate or advanced glaucoma, based on the mean deviation of the visual field examination. Mean (95% - confidence interval) IOP dropped from 21.8 (20.8-22.8) at baseline to 13.2 (11.8-14.6) mmHg after 5 years (p < 0.001). Mean number of IOP-lowering medications was reduced from 2.5 (2.2-2.9) at baseline to 0.9 (0.5-1.2), 1.0 (0.7-1.4), and 1.1 (0.7-1.5) after three, four, and five years (all p < 0.001). Needling or surgical revision was performed in twelve eyes (18%). Nineteen eyes (29%) required further IOP-lowering surgery. Postoperative complications were usually mild and self-limiting and included early hypotony, shallow anterior chamber, and hyphaema.

conclusionsAfter five years, the MicroShunt was found to be a safe procedure, leading to a sustained reduction in mean IOP and number of IOP-lowering medications. However, almost one third of the eyes required further IOP-lowering interventions.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, Open-AngleProsthesis ImplantationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedMitomycinPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesAntihypertensive AgentsMitomycin

Identifiers

PMID39979610
PMCPMC12089333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.