ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
An Examination of Ventricular Assist Device Duration Prior to Heart Transplant in Children.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rehabilitation in children with ventricular assist devices.JHLT open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent data demonstrate worse heart transplant (HTx) outcomes in children with shorter VAD durations, but do not account for VAD adverse events (AEs)Es. We compared outcomes of patients bridged to HTx with < 30 vs. ≥ 30 days of VAD support in an earlier era by assessing both VAD and HTx risk factors. We merged data from the PediMACS and Pediatric Heart Transplant Study registries to compare one-year post-HTx mortality in patients with < 30 vs. ≥ 30 days of pre-HTx VAD support between 2012 and 2018. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores (PS) to control for confounders, including age, blood type, allosensitization, cardiac diagnosis (cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, or myocarditis), VAD support type (left, right, single, or biventricular VAD), and pre-Tx mechanical ventilation and vasoactive support. Among 271 patients, there were 60 in the < 30-days and 211 in the ≥ 30-days groups. At HTx, the < 30-days group used more ventilation (34% vs. 7%, p < 0.001) and vasoactives (60% vs. 24%, p < 0.001 vs. ≥ 30-days). The weighted AE rate/patient was 0.42 in the < 30-days vs. 0.78 in the ≥ 30-days group (p = 0.02). There were 2 deaths in the < 30-days group and 13 in the ≥ 30-days group (p = 0.38). A PS-weighted Cox model, adjusted for 30-day VAD AE rate, demonstrated a non-significant mortality hazard ratio of 0.43 for < 30-days vs. ≥ 30-days group (95%CI 0.07-2.70, p = 0.37). In this era, there was no difference in survival based on VAD duration prior to HTx. This finding requires additional comparisons to the current era of VAD as a bridge to Tx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39979607What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.