Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979603›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of managerial strategies for enhancing teacher motivation in Public and Private Schools.

Zhengliang Gao, Guangjiao Hu, Shahla Akram, Mehboob Ul Hassan, Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad, Sajjad Ahmad Jan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhengliang GaoSuzhou Institute of Trade and Commerce, Suzhou, 215009, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Guangjiao HuSoochow Facility Management Service Group, Suzhou, 215021, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. 2011021962@szjm.edu.cn.
Shahla AkramDepartment of Economics, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, Pakistan. shahlaakram4@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-3950
Mehboob Ul HassanIslamic Banking Center, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3453-695X
Muhammad Farrukh ShahzadCollege of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6578-4139
Sajjad Ahmad JanDevelopment Insights Lab (DIL), University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the strategies used by Pakistani school principals in both public and private institutions to improve teacher motivation. Data were gathered from 150 teachers across three cities in Pakistan: Lahore, Multan, and Faisalabad. The study used a mixed-methods approach, employing both closed-ended and open-ended questionnaires for teachers. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 school principals to provide deeper insights. Principal component analysis (PCA) and inferential statistics were used in quantitative analysis, and thematic analysis was used to examine qualitative data. The results show that public and private schools differ significantly in resource allocation, motivational techniques and leadership styles. Private school teachers were more motivated due to their greater flexibility, individual support, and external recognition programs. Public schools, on the other hand, struggled with a lack of individual instruction, strict structures and scarce resources. The study highlights the importance of managerial strategies for increasing teacher motivation. Policymakers should consider ways to provide greater support to public schools, with a particular focus on developing more responsive leadership structures and providing resources for teacher professional development and engagement.

Identifiers

PMID39979603
PMCPMC11842624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.