SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2026
Congenital penile curvature treatments in adults: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes.
Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Congenital Penile Curvature Is Associated With Larger Penile Dimensions: A Matched Case-Control Study.Andrology · 2026Article
- Advanced genital reconstructive surgery: evolving techniques, expanding indications and future directions.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital penile curvature is a rare condition identified by an abnormal penile curvature present from birth. Surgical intervention is currently the most effective treatment and is generally deferred until after puberty; however, early correction is recommended by some due to its impact on psychosexual development. This systematic review aims to evaluate the literature on surgical techniques for congenital penile curvature correction, focusing on their efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024526737), the review includes 59 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The findings indicate that numerous surgical techniques have been documented over the past decades, predominantly focusing on shortening procedures such as Nesbit, Yachia, tunica albuginea plication, and Essed-Schröder. These historically utilized methods remain effective for correcting congenital penile curvature, but they may result in side effects like penile shortening and erectile dysfunction. The review emphasizes the necessity for well-designed studies to better compare the benefits of various surgical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39979594What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.