Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979581›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Design and evaluation of children's education interactive learning system based on human computer interaction technology.

Mengru Li, Yang Lv, Yongming Pu, Min Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengru LiTeachers' College, Chengdu University, Chengdu, 628000, China.
Yang LvTeachers' College, Chengdu University, Chengdu, 628000, China. 18683625582@163.com.
Yongming PuTeachers' College, Chengdu University, Chengdu, 628000, China.
Min WuCollege of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to develop and evaluate an interactive learning system for children. Through mixed-method research, combined with quantitative and qualitative data analysis, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the educational effectiveness of the system. The study involves children in grades 1-6, and data on learning effectiveness before and after using the system are collected through pre-experiments and formal experiments. The results of the quantitative analysis show that after using the system, the average improvement rates for students in grades 1-3 and 4-6 are 24.6% and 22.2% in mathematics and 28.1% and 26.8% in science. The average response time of the system is 1.77 s, with the longest response time being 3.1 s. User satisfaction reaches 94%, and the error rate is 0.2%. These results demonstrate that the developed learning system significantly impacts children's learning effectiveness and optimizing user experience.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionLearningUser-Computer InterfaceChildFemaleHumansMaleMathematicsStudentsChildren’s educationHuman-computer interaction learning systemPerformance evaluationUser satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39979581
PMCPMC11842731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.