ArticleThe protein journal2025
An Analysis of Intrinsic Protein Disorder in Antimicrobial Peptides.
Article in The protein journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unstructured, disulfide-bridged C-terminus in helminth α-helical antimicrobial peptides enhances and modulates their activity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Peptides Against Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria: Focus on Machine Learning.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance, driven by the rise of pathogens like VRE and MRSA, poses a global health threat, prompting the exploration of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as alternatives to traditional antibiotics. AMPs, known for their broad-spectrum activity and structural flexibility, share characteristics with intrinsically disordered proteins, which lack a rigid structure and play diverse roles in cellular processes. This study aims to quantify the intrinsic disorder and liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) propensity in AMPs, advancing our understanding of their antimicrobial mechanisms and potential therapeutic applications. To investigate the propensity for intrinsic disorder and LLPS in AMPs, we compared the AMPs to the human proteome. The AMP sequences were retrieved from the AMP database (APD3), while the human proteome was obtained from the UniProt database. We analyzed amino acid composition using the Composition Profiler tool and assessed intrinsic disorder using various predictors, including PONDR® and IUPred, through the Rapid Intrinsic Disorder Analysis Online (RIDAO) platform. For LLPS propensity, we employed FuzDrop, and FuzPred was used to predict context-dependent binding behaviors. Statistical analyses, such as ANOVA and χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.