Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979549›Full record

ReviewNature human behaviour2025

A framework for understanding adverse adolescent experiences.

A Pollmann, K E Bates, D Fuhrmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature human behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. From daily maternal worry to adolescents' emotion dysregulation: The mediating role of maternal privacy invasion.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A PollmannInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. Ayla.Pollmann@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8471-8869
K E Bates *Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8188-6058
D Fuhrmann *Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

RCUK | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) ES/T015861/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence (ages 10-24) is characterized by cognitive, behavioural and social development. Childhood environments are typically centred on home and care settings, whereas adolescents increasingly engage with peer and community environments. These changing environments confer risks of experiencing specific adversities at different ages. Despite the unique characteristics of adversities in adolescence and potential associations with lifespan outcomes, few frameworks exist to systematize adversities in adolescents. Here we review current research and propose an approach specific to this developmental period: the adverse adolescent experiences (AAEs) framework. Building on existing models (for example, the adverse childhood experiences framework), the AAEs focus on potentially traumatizing experiences during adolescence. The framework builds on Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory to conceptualize adversities at intrapersonal, interpersonal, community and societal levels. We argue that this approach can enhance our understanding of adolescent adversity, facilitate the study of its potential effects, and guide prevention and intervention efforts.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAdolescent DevelopmentAdverse Childhood ExperiencesAdolescentChildHumansSocial EnvironmentYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.